The systems we live with are not ideal; and, our lives are certainly not ideal. We all got problems that we have to solve every day. Even a decision to not solve the problem and leave it as-is is a type of problem-solving.
We already published in one of our blogs, Where do problems come from? What generates a problem, and described where problems originate from.
There are generally two types of problems.
For instance: low production yield, high level of defects.
Predictable problems are typically solved slowly, scientifically by creating and completing projects bringing only positive emotions. When we solve predictable problems, we always move forward.
For instance: sudden yield drops, sudden & unexpected defects increase.
Unpredictable problems, also called excursions, bring only negative emotions. People typically don’t know what to do and where to start. Actually, in most cases, they what to get back to basic. Return the situation to the condition that was before the excursion.
When we are trying to solve unpredictable problems, we are moving backward.
However, it is wrong to just move back to basic. Even in the case of an excursion, we should learn the failure and the problem and move forward. Otherwise, excursions will manage our lives.
COVID-19 is an example of a classical excursion. The only thing that people want is to get back to the previous situation, to the way it was before the pandemic hit. And, as we said before, this is wrong.
To analyze the situation of the current pandemic, we want to seek help in the PRIZ Innovation Platform and the tools it provides. Specifically “40 Inventive Principles”.
Here, we want to take you through the process step by step.
Prior to using any of the tools, especially 40 Inventive Principles, we have to define the problem statement (more about it in How to define a problem statement?). As the platform suggests, we should define it in a number of steps.
People started to get infected, and the government declared a state of the emergency as a result of the pandemic.
In a way, people became dangerous to each other.
Step three: Problem statement
How are the above disadvantages making us behave differently?
The problem statement as we defined it is:
The population is forced to keep a distance from each other and that affects their day-to-day life. They have to get used to a new world under pandemic.
Great, we have a problem to solve. Now, we can use 40 Inventive Principles and try to find a possible solution.
In the past, we have described in details the concepts and how to use the tool within the PRIZ platform: PROBLEM SOLVING USING 40 INVENTIVE PRINCIPLES.
Let’s walk through the process step by step.
People should be completely isolated to avoid any infection from each other.
IF we keep people completely isolated
THEN there will be no infections
BUT a lot of businesses will be affected
For the improving parameter, we chose:
#30. External harm affects the object
For the worsening parameter, we chose:
In this case, the system recommended four inventive principles:
#22. Blessing in disguise
#35. Parameter changes
#13. The Other way around
Note: The order of principles is important, and we should consider them in the provided order. However, it does not mean that the first one is the most relevant.
Reading the explanations and examples of the recommended principles, we decided that #13. The Other way around is the strongest.
The main tip of the principle is, “Turn the object or process upside down.”
Our idea is to delegate the responsibility for the infection from government organizations, through punishments and fines, to the person himself.
While the government provides recommendations and requirements, it assumes full responsibility for the infection and medical treatment of the population. Maybe it is an excellent time to turn over the responsibility onto the citizen. The government should continue to provide all the necessary information about how to avoid an infection, but this is not always working. People do not follow the regulation and try to overcome the requirements. Why does it happen? It has a very easy explanation. They disagree with the government; people are sure it will never happen to them personally.
Delegate the responsibility to the resident, at least partially. For instance, to set a minimum deductible for medical expenses. In this case, a person will fill liable and will make everything possible to avoid infections. The formula is trivial: if you got infected – pay for medical treatment. We are sure people will start to wear masks, keep distance, avoid large gatherings.
Of course, it might be far from the ideal solution for some. Others will absolutely hate this idea, for their own reasons.
The point is, anyone is capable of generating ideas for even very complex problems. And we really encourage you to. Take a shot with the PRIZ Innovation Platform, and we will more than welcome any ideas that come out of it.
Think about the rest of the recommended principles, analyze the situation, and generate solutions.
LOGIN to PRIZ Innovation Platform and start your project.
Problem solving and innovation are often seen as separate concepts, but they are actually closely intertwined. While problem solving involves finding solutions to complex issues, innovation is about introducing new ideas or approaches. Effective problem solving incorporates innovative thinking, whether it’s in designing projects, analyzing data, or collaborating with others. In our modern era, where systems are more complex than ever, problem solving requires a structured and systematic approach. Leading companies like Samsung, LG Electronics, and TSMC have recognized the value of this approach and have achieved success by applying innovative methods. By adopting these practices, businesses can improve operational…
At PRIZ, we are dedicated to accelerating the problem-solving process with the help of our AI assistant. In line with this vision, we are excited to announce a significant enhancement to the PRIZ Platform – the integration of an AI assistant specifically designed to assist in defining problem statements. With this latest development, you now have the ability to streamline the process of building a problem statement, almost putting it on autopilot. While our goal is not to fully automate the process, our AI assistant provides conversational support. It acts as a collaborative participant, engaging in conversations with engineers to…
This article explores the various components of production costs and the factors that lead to their escalation, such as inflation, technological advancements, and market shifts. It emphasizes the need for a problem-solving culture as a strategy for effective cost reduction and highlights hidden opportunities for cost reduction through process optimization. The article further provides a simple strategy for reducing production costs by categorizing operations and improving or eliminating them accordingly. Production costs Production cost refers to the total expenses incurred in making a product or providing a service, including materials, labor, and related costs. For a more detailed explanation of…
This article discusses the importance of using engineering thinking to solve problems in an engineering environment instead of resorting to engineering guessing. It covers the dangers of engineering guessing and the benefits of using engineering thinking. The article also outlines a systematic approach to problem-solving using problem-solving tools and facilitation, such as the PRIZ Innovation platform. Proper documentation, defining the problem statement, identifying root causes, and understanding the process are all essential components of engineering thinking, which is the only way to generate fast and effective solutions. Types of Problems in a Production Environment A healthy and growing production can…
Engineering work is built on three essential pillars: process improvement, cost reduction, and root cause analysis. Engineers should dedicate their thinking to a specific and measurable target, use thinking tools and resources, and recognize and value engineering thinking. The PRIZ Innovation Platform offers tools for engineering thinking, including Process Functional Modeling, 40 Inventive Principles, and Effective Brainstorming. Engineers should focus on improving only those operations that increase the value of the product, remove all operations that do not increase the value of the product, and understand the origin of defects and eliminate them. What does an engineer do? What does…
Process improvement is crucial for organizational success. It helps organizations to stay competitive, reduce costs, improve quality and efficiency, become more responsive to changing market conditions, and encourage innovation. There are several process improvement methodologies available, each with its own set of tools and techniques. However, these tools rely heavily on people’s creativity and analytical skills, which can be a trial-and-error process for teams. PRIZ Guru offers analytical and problem-solving tools to assist engineers at any step of the process improvement undertaking, equipping teams to overcome barriers during this initiative. What is process? As usual, we will start with an…
In today’s rapidly changing world, problem-solving and critical thinking skills are becoming more crucial than ever. One specific skill that can help individuals creatively solve problems is engineering thinking. In schools and universities, we teach math, physics, biology, programming, and many other tools. This is great! Knowing tools is extremely important. Unfortunately, despite its high demand, the current education system often neglects this very important skill called Engineering Thinking. The consequences of this neglect are significant. Without engineering thinking, students are not fully equipped to tackle real-world problems they may encounter in their future careers. Many students may find themselves…
This case study explores the usage of Process Functional Modeling (PFM) as a problem-solving tool in microchip manufacturing. PFM is an innovative way of thinking that involves breaking down a process into its components on multiple levels and generating innovative solutions. The tool enables us to move from general to specific, from process to operations, operations to components, and components to functions. In this article, we provide a real-life example of how a team applied PFM to the microchip manufacturing process. We want to demonstrate its effectiveness in creating a model of failure in the context of the whole process….